Intimations of Recession

August 7, 2006

 

By: Paul Krugman

These are the dog days of summer, but there’s a chill in the air. Suddenly — really just in the last few weeks — people have starting talking seriously about a possible recession. And it’s not just economists who seem worried. Goldman Sachs recently reported that the confidence of chief executives at major corporations has plunged; a clear majority of C.E.O.’s now say that conditions in the world economy, and the U.S. economy in particular, are worsening rather than improving.

On the face of it, this loss of faith seems strange. Recent growth and jobs numbers have been disappointing, but not disastrous.

But economic numbers don’t speak for themselves. They always have to be interpreted as part of a story. And the latest numbers, while not that bad taken out of context, seem inconsistent with the stories optimists were telling about the U.S. economy.

The key point is that the forces that caused a recession five years ago never went away. Business spending hasn’t really recovered from the slump it went into after the technology bubble burst: nonresidential investment as a share of G.D.P., though up a bit from its low point, is still far below its levels in the late 1990’s. Also, the trade deficit has doubled since 2000, diverting a lot of demand away from goods produced in the United States.

Nonetheless, the economy grew fairly fast over the last three years, mainly thanks to a gigantic housing boom. This boom led directly to unprecedented spending on home construction. It also allowed consumers to convert rising home values into cash through mortgage refinancing, so that consumer spending could run far ahead of families’ incomes. (Americans have been spending more than they earn for the past year and a half.)

Even optimists generally concede that the housing boom must eventually end, and that consumers will eventually have to start saving again. But the conventional wisdom was that housing would have a “soft landing” — that the boom would taper off gradually, and that other sources of growth would take its place. You might say that the theory was that business investment and exports would stand up as housing stood down.

The latest numbers suggest, however, that this theory isn’t working much better on the economic front than it is in Baghdad.

Signs of a deflating housing bubble began appearing a year ago, but for a while it was possible to argue that eliminating a bit of “froth” in the housing market wouldn’t do the overall economy much harm. Now, for the first time, problems in the housing market are starting to seriously reduce economic growth: the latest G.D.P. data show real residential investment falling at an accelerating pace. The latest job numbers show falling employment in home construction, and retail employment has fallen over the past year, suggesting that consumer spending is running out of steam. (Gas at $3 a gallon doesn’t help, either.)

Meanwhile, neither business investment nor exports seem to be growing fast enough to make up for the housing slump.

Now maybe we’ll still manage that soft landing despite a rapidly rising number of unsold houses; or maybe there’s a boom in business investment and/or exports just over the horizon. But based on what we know now, there’s an economic slowdown coming.

This slowdown might not be sharp enough to be formally declared a recession. But weak growth feels like a recession to most people; remember the long “jobless recovery” that followed the official end of the 2001 recession?

And what will policy makers do about a slump, if it happens? A snarky but accurate description of monetary policy over the past five years is that the Federal Reserve successfully replaced the technology bubble with a housing bubble. But where will the Fed find another bubble?

And with the budget still deep in deficit and the costs of the Iraq war still spiraling upward, it’s hard to see Congress agreeing on any significant fiscal stimulus package — especially because history suggests that the Bush administration and Congressional leaders will turn any debate about how to help the economy into yet another attempt to smuggle in tax cuts for the wealthy.

One last thing: the real wages of most workers fell during the “Bush boom” of the last three years. If that boom, such as it was, is already over, workers have every right to ask, “Is that it?”

Advertisements

9 Responses to “Intimations of Recession”

  1. Juan Says:

    Our monetary policy is designed to temper the rises and falls of the economy, in the ultimate goal of smoothing out the bulls and the bears into a steady rise of GDP (4% a year, the economists dream.) However, capitalism is built on volatility, and any first year student can tell you you can’t flip three pages in an economics textbook without hearing the word “cycle.” Yet somehow, everyone seems so surprised when economies fall into recessions or growth spurs, and the national media amplies and fuels the panics by announcing that this is something “new and different (The “New economy” of 1999, without a recession ever again, for example?) The truth is, we will hit another recession sooner or later, and then we’ll go back to growth. Capitalism thrives on building new things, and it’s easiest to grow once something has been destroyed.

    Personally, I think monetary policy, combined with the housing boom, softened the recession of 2001/2 a little bit too well. The public was waiting for the resounding repercussions of the stock market falling (normalizing), but hardly felt a dent. It was one of the mildest recessions on record. And perhaps, like draining a volcano, we didn’t allow the economy to sink far enough to begin growing again. Articles of uncertainty, such as the one above, seem to imply that we’re still reeling from the recession that never happened, and looking for another to start up soon.

  2. crestosssa Says:

    Hey

    I was surfing the web and i saw this site, pretty cool.
    Currently im running and adult site:Reachton
    k, just want to say hi 🙂
    Can i link you from my site? im looking for quality content like yours. If no let me know if i can add u in exchange for a montly fee or something.

  3. Music-Band Says:

    Hey

    I was surfing the web and i saw this site, pretty cool.
    Currently im running and adult site:Reachton
    k, just want to say hi 🙂
    Can i link you from my site? im looking for quality content like yours. If no let me know if i can add u in exchange for a montly fee or something.

  4. weight loss Says:

    weight loss

    Intimations of Recession | Krugman\’s the man

  5. buy bitcoin on paypal Says:

    buy bitcoin on paypal

    Intimations of Recession | Krugman\’s the man

  6. Buy Bitcoin With Credit Card Fast Says:

    Buy Bitcoin With Credit Card Fast

    Intimations of Recession | Krugman\’s the man

  7. happy new year messages daughter Says:

    Howdy! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before
    but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me.
    Anyhow, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

  8. happy new year wallpapers for Android Says:

    I think the admin of this web site is genuinely working hard
    in favor of his website, because here every material is quality based material.

  9. happy new year quotes And sayings Says:

    Can you tell us more about this? I’d like to find out more details.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: